Recently, the PAIR site has started one of those word verification things to make sure the user is human and not a computer program. They say they want to prevent "disruptive use by automated programs". I suspect that translates to "our database engine sucks", but ok. There is no verification required for the regular patent or application search. Unfortunately, it looks like I can add "can't read very well" to my list of shortcomings. For example:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78d68/78d68b5da320ecdb0fd12d2d7ea1019bae4c6f3d" alt=""
"Si flame"?
No. Try again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf728/bf728539be67982be8778fe683fcc7ffb4c166d8" alt=""
"squeeze... turf"?
No. Idiot. Try again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d44c/8d44c4618d3ba5f1d7ab34854e52598f0721d128" alt=""
"MELLEN filed"?
No.
FUCK!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/620fb/620fb4e75605ca41c6634b96e123fc29def803ba" alt=""
*"File wrapper" is what the USPTO calls the folder containing all the documents relating to a patent. I don't know why they say 'file wrapper' as opposed to 'file'.
3 comments:
It is really neat that this information is now easily available. I don't know why they call it a "file wrapper" either.
Lay people may not realize why this is important, but there is a lot of information in this material that can tell one about patent examiner questions, clues to possible ways to invalidate a patent like statute of limitations arguments, claims that were rejected and other things that can be useful in deciding how to invent around a patent and just how enforcable a patent is.
So this really is a big deal.
Yep. It's great, except for the lack of accessibility to the Chaoncapped.
Well, that goes without saying.
Post a Comment